I agree, however increasing those timeouts may hide the issue or as I
stated possibly indicate a timing issue. The trace is ideal, but
depending on how much traffic is going through the device that may be
like looking for a needle in a haystack.
-- John LeMay K. Hovnanian Companies, LLC Systems Engineer Ph. 732 383-2195 jlemay@khov.com -----Original Message----- From: lb-l-bounces@vegan.net [mailto:lb-l-bounces@vegan.net] On Behalf Of Omachonu Ogali Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 11:22 To: Load Balancing Mailing List Subject: Re: [load balancing] F5 LTM marking nodes down But if the issue was the frequency of the monitor, he would be seeing intermittent up/down events from both units, not just the standby. A network sniff is really needed to see exactly what is going on. oo On Nov 7, 2007 10:48 AM, LeMay, John <JLeMay@khov.com> wrote: > > > > A possible resolution, really a workaround, may be to use custom > monitors for http and icmp with increased timer and interval values. > I've done this in the past for different reasons, and it doesn't tell > you where the issue is of course. If you do go this route, F5 has > recommended to me in the past that the timeout should always equal > three times the interval plus one second (the online help recommends > the same). This may even give a clue to the root cause of the issue. > If you increase the timeout and interval and the issue goes away, chances are the issue is latency of some sort. > > If you can get this to happen at predictable times, you could always > run tcpdump on the standby box during that time period and see if > there are any clues in the trace. > > -- > John LeMay > K. Hovnanian Companies, LLC > Systems Engineer > Ph. 732 383-2195 > jlemay@khov.com > > > > ________________________________ > > From: lb-l-bounces@vegan.net [mailto:lb-l-bounces@vegan.net] On Behalf > Of Julian Grunnell > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 10:14 > To: lb-l@vegan.net > Subject: [load balancing] F5 LTM marking nodes down > > > > > Hi - got a query regarding alerts that a STANDBY LTM 1500 is > generating, we have a pair of LTM 1500's in an ACTIVE / STANDBY setup using vlangroups. > Version 9.3.0 is installed. The nodes behind the LTMs are Microsoft > 2003 IIS 6.0 servers using ACTIVE / PASSIVE NIC teaming. > > We see on a daily basis the STANDBY LTM marking nodes as DOWN and then > UP for both icmp and HTTP health checks, often a minute or two > inbetween the state changes, the ACTIVE LTM NEVER logs anything. > > At the times the alerts are seen the guys that admin the web servers > cannot see anything wrong at all - the servers are up and running. And > the guys that admin the network infrastructure cannot see any errors > at all from any of the switchports. What I have seen is that when the > STANDBY LTM has the node marked DOWN I can both ping the node in > question and make a port 80 connection from the STANDY LTM which is just bizarre. > > If anyone has any ideas on where the problem might lie, things that > would be worth checking or even better have had this problem before > and how to resolve it I would appreciate it!! > > Thanks - Julian. > > > Julian Grunnell > 3rd Line Technical Support > Pipex Communications > > Tel: 01296 300227 > Mob: 07803 649593 > Web: http://www.pipex.com/ > > This e-mail is subject to: http://www.pipex.net/disclaimer.html > > _______________________________________________ > lb-l mailing list > lb-l@vegan.net > http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l > Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com > Load Balancing Digest Take the survey: > http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=bpQsLdWxilL3kW3FyWjKvw_3d_3d > _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list lb-l@vegan.net http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest Take the survey: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=bpQsLdWxilL3kW3FyWjKvw_3d_3d _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list lb-l@vegan.net http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest Take the survey: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=bpQsLdWxilL3kW3FyWjKvw_3d_3dReceived on Wed Nov 7 11:54:29 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 07 2007 - 11:54:30 EST