RE: [load balancing] Layer 2 path vs Layer 3

From: Titus, Tim (tim_titusIZZATcccpp.com)
Date: Mon Oct 23 2000 - 13:01:12 EDT


That's probably why Cisco decided to buy Arrowpoint!

-Tim Titus------------------------
Director, Internet Operations, CCC
-----<www.ccclearn.com>-----------

-----Original Message-----
From: tony bourke [mailto:tonyIZZATvegan.net]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:07 AM
To: 'lb-lIZZATvegan.net'
Subject: RE: [load balancing] Layer 2 path vs Layer 3

> Local Directors support Direct Server Return as well. As long as you have
a
> CAT 65K and ASLB configured. Cisco calls it ASLB (Accelerated Server Load
> Balancing). The painful part is you have to have mappings for all of you
> VIPs in two places, the switch and the ld.

All that marketing hype for just a glorified DSR? I thought it was
something much fancier. Sheesh.

Tony

>
> Later.
> -Lance
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tony bourke [mailto:tonyIZZATvegan.net]
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 4:00 PM
> To: lb-lIZZATvegan.net
> Subject: Re: [load balancing] Layer 2 path vs Layer 3
>
>
> > Was wondering what specific products implemented this.
>
> Direct Server Return supporting vendors:
>
> Radware (i forget what they call it), Intel, Alteon, Foundry (calls it
> SwitchBack sometimes), F5 BIG-IP (they call it nPath)
>
> Those are the ones I know of
>
> Tony
>
> >
> > Michael
> >
>
> -------------- -- ---- ---- --- - - - - - -- - - - - - -
> Tony Bourke tonyIZZATvegan.net
>
>

-------------- -- ---- ---- --- - - - - - -- - - - - - -
Tony Bourke tonyIZZATvegan.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Nov 05 2000 - 15:09:07 EST