unsubscribe lbl-vegan
> I heard about teaming technology.
> It can help you to do that.
> ----start info from intel sites----
> http://support.intel.com/support/network/adapter/ans/index.htm
> http://support.intel.com/support/network/adapter/ans/teaming.htm
> Adapter Fault Tolerance (AFT) - Can be mixed Intel adapter types/speeds as
> long as there is at least one server adapter in the team. Primary adapter
> will pass it's MAC and L3 address to the failover adapter. Implemented in
> Microsoft Windows* 2000 and Windows NT* 4 , NetWare* 4.1x and above, SCO
> UnixWare* (10/100), and Linux.
> ----end info from intel sites----
> When I test AFT last year, it need 1minutes or more to failover.
> Regards,
> -Mansu Kim
> mailto:mansukimIZZATnortelnetworks.com
> job://SE.Korea.CNBU.Nortel.Networks
> phone://+82-2-3707-3955
> mobile://+82-16-288-3771
> Postal: Nortel Networks Korea Ltd.
> 16th Floor, Hae Sung 2 Bldg. 942-10 Daechi3-Dong,
> Kangnam-Ku, Seoul, Korea 135-283
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Patrick McAndrew [mailto:PMcAndrewIZZATstudentadvantage.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:48 AM
>> To: 'lb-lIZZATvegan.net'
>> Subject: RE: [load balancing] switch redundancy
>>
>>
>> The two nic's will be connected to two layer two switches.
>> The switches will be connected to a pair of load balancers.
>> The servers will be in a seperate vlan, their network will be
>> a RFC1918 compliant one.
>>
>> I am assuming the server nic's would be in seperate bridge groups?
>>
>> I am going to be running HSRP on the switches, but I'm
>> wondering how to get the server to notice when a switch is
>> down, and use the other interface.
>>
>> Does anyone have experience with doing that? If I don't make
>> myself clear, email me.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Pat
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Stephane LITKOWSKI [mailto:st_litkowskiIZZAThotmail.com]
>> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 11:48 AM
>> > To: lb-lIZZATvegan.net
>> > Subject: Re: [load balancing] switch redundancy
>> >
>> >
>> > What r u talking about ? Layer 2 switches ? or Layer 3 or 4
>> switches ?
>> > Are the server nic's bridged between them ?
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Patrick McAndrew" <PMcAndrewIZZATstudentadvantage.com>
>> > To: <lb-lIZZATvegan.net>
>> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 5:29 PM
>> > Subject: [load balancing] switch redundancy
>> >
>> >
>> > > Hello all,
>> > >
>> > > I'm wondering how some of you use switch redundancy.
>> > >
>> > > Here's the situation:
>> > > I want my webservers to have two nic's in each box.
>> > > The two nic's will be connected to two differant
>> switches. They will
>> > > have an identical configuration, I don't want to
>> > do anything
>> > > fancy, just provibe switch redundancy.
>> > >
>> > > What is a good way to go about doing this? STP? How will
>> > the servers know
>> > > not to use one nic as opposed to the other?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks in advance!
>> > > Pat
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
--Gabriel Guillon, CS SI
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 04:07:02 EDT