Re: [load balancing] Number of Virtual Servers on a LTM 1500

From: Mike Horwath <drechsau [izzat] gmail.com>
Date: Tue Jul 25 2006 - 11:39:30 EDT

On 7/25/06, Claret Carvalho <claretc@comcast.net> wrote:
> We are still new to the F5 LTM 1500 appliances and are running 9.1.2 but
> based on our initial review, the GUI seems to be taking a while to load the
> Nodes & Virtual Servers page (approx ~70 have been configured) of them. Both
> were still trying to load after about 30s. The other GUI tabs have no issues
> and appear rather quickly.
>
> It appears the box has ample cycles of CPU available from the 'tmstat' and
> 'ps' utility, so I am just wondering where it is getting bogged down. We
> were going to re-try it with 9.2.3 in the event there are any code issues
> but just wondering if anyone is using that many virtual servers and has seen
> this effect with any of their production LTM 1500 devices.

You should open a ticket with F5 about this.

You may also be having browser issues - if tables are large, Safari
(for one) can get kind of bogged down.

-- 
Mike Horwath
drechsau@gmail.com
____________________
The Load Balancing Mailing List
Unsubscribe:    mailto:majordomo@vegan.net?body=unsubscribe%20lb-l
Archive:        http://vegan.net/lb/archive
LBDigest:       http://lbdigest.com
MRTG with SLB:  http://vegan.net/MRTG
Hosted by:	http://www.tokkisystems.com
Received on Tue Jul 25 11:39:32 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 25 2006 - 11:46:04 EDT