From: Stanley, Jon (Jon.StanleyIZZATsavvis.net)
Date: Thu Jul 03 2003 - 16:33:26 EDT
Another alternative is to use DSR (Direct Server Return), aka
SwitchBack, where the Foundry, upon receving a request for the VIP,
translates the destination MAC address from being that of the Foundry to
the MAC of the server. In order for this to work, you have to configure
a loopback interface on every real server that has the IP of the VIP.
If the servers are Windows, M$ will try to help you out by adding a
route to the subnet in the routing table through the new loopback
interface. This is not what you want. What's more, it will do it at
every reboot. What we do to get around this is set up a scheduled task
in Windows that runs at startup. What this task does is delete the
extraneous route.
Hope this helps.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-lb-lIZZATvegan.net [mailto:owner-lb-lIZZATvegan.net] On Behalf Of
tony bourke
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:53 PM
To: lb-lIZZATvegan.net
Subject: Re: [load balancing] Foundry switches, and network topo....
Hi Gabriel,
I haven't tested this with all versions of the code, but it should work.
The configuration is called a one-armed, route-path, flat-based
architecture.
Here's how it works: The default route for the servers is an IP on the
foundry. The default route for the Foundry is the router. Everything
is
on the same subnet (although you could do this with two subnets
hypothetically with VLAN tagging on the switch and the Foundry, I don't
know if the Foundry is capable of this, however. It's been a while
since
I worked on one).
Configure the virtual servers and real servers on the same subnet, point
the default gateways, and you should be set.
I don't recall the command to disable MAC subsitution on Foundry, or if
it's defined by default in the version of code you're using, but you
might
have to disable it. Otherwise, your network might do some funky stuff.
Tony
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Gabriel wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I've got a SLB 8, running the latest software release, and I'm trying
to set
> it up to hang off of a single switch port (so that the traffic would
go
> from the router, across the switch, then to the foundry, back across
the
> switch to the real servers. All across a single connection to the
foundry.
>
> (i.e.,: router->switch[c1]->foundry->switch[c1]->servers. )
>
> The network topology looks about like this:
>
> router->switch->foundry
> ||||
> real servers
>
> Does this work, or am I trying to piss in the wind?
>
> If it works, how? (config wise)
>
> TIA,
> Gabriel
>
>
-- -------------- -- ---- ---- --- - - - - - -- - - - - - - Tony Bourke tonyIZZATvegan.net____________________ The Load Balancing Mailing List Unsubscribe: mailto:majordomoIZZATvegan.net?body=unsubscribe%20lb-l Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive LBDigest: http://lbdigest.com MRTG with SLB: http://vegan.net/MRTG Hosted by: http://www.tokkisystems.com
____________________ The Load Balancing Mailing List Unsubscribe: mailto:majordomoIZZATvegan.net?body=unsubscribe%20lb-l Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive LBDigest: http://lbdigest.com MRTG with SLB: http://vegan.net/MRTG Hosted by: http://www.tokkisystems.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jul 03 2003 - 16:40:57 EDT