Hi
Here are some of the advantages of Radware WSD vs. Alteon:
* Non-blocking architecture which allows wire speed switching.
* Advanced Application level Intrusion Prevention and DoS
protection
* Integrated Global load balancing solution (no need to purchase
additional unit) that uses accurate load and proximity measurements
(Patented technology) combined with wide range of redirection methods
* Bandwidth management per user/session and the ability to use
CBQ (class Based Queuing) to ensure service levels of time sensitive
applications e.g. VoIP, Video conferencing etc.
* Load balancing of SIP servers while maintaining session/call
persistency
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Udi
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-lb-l@vegan.net [mailto:owner-lb-l@vegan.net] On Behalf Of
Rubens Kuhl Jr.
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 3:35 PM
To: lb-l@vegan.net
Subject: [load balancing] Radware WSD x Alteon 22xx, 34xx
Due to some business issues, one customer has these only two choices
for web-server load-balancing (no SSL acceleration): recycling some
Radware AS II boxes and deploying WS software in them, or buying newer
Alteon boxes.
What are the ups and downs of one box against another ?
Rubens
____________________
The Load Balancing Mailing List
Unsubscribe: mailto:majordomo@vegan.net?body=unsubscribe%20lb-l
Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
LBDigest: http://lbdigest.com
MRTG with SLB: http://vegan.net/MRTG
Hosted by: http://www.tokkisystems.com
____________________
The Load Balancing Mailing List
Unsubscribe: mailto:majordomo@vegan.net?body=unsubscribe%20lb-l
Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
LBDigest: http://lbdigest.com
MRTG with SLB: http://vegan.net/MRTG
Hosted by: http://www.tokkisystems.com
Received on Thu Jun 22 14:40:41 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 22 2006 - 15:02:22 EDT