Re: [load balancing] The GSLB Page of Shame

From: William Bivens (wjbivensIZZATdigitalme.com)
Date: Wed Mar 31 2004 - 19:38:08 EST

• Previous message: Kleberg, Jason: "[load balancing] open source FW LB available?"
• In reply to: P: "[load balancing] The GSLB Page of Shame"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

It's a shame the GSLB manifesto couldn't be more neutral, it makes some
very valid point. There are several reasons to use GSLB and several
workarounds for the specific problems, it just seems that the author
chose not to highlight or know them.

Sincerely,

Jay Bivens

On Mar 30, 2004, at 2:01 PM, P wrote:

> A paper that describes why DNS based GSLB solutions cannot work
> reliably for browser based clients.
>
>  
>
> http://www.tenereillo.com/GSLBPageOfShame.htm
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Pete.
>
>  

____________________
The Load Balancing Mailing List
Unsubscribe: mailto:majordomoIZZATvegan.net?body=unsubscribe%20lb-l
Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
LBDigest: http://lbdigest.com
MRTG with SLB: http://vegan.net/MRTG
Hosted by: http://www.tokkisystems.com

• Previous message: Kleberg, Jason: "[load balancing] open source FW LB available?"
• In reply to: P: "[load balancing] The GSLB Page of Shame"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:35:45 EDT