Re: [load balancing] Cisco CSS vs. NetScaler?

From: Alex Samonte (asamonteIZZATprison.net)
Date: Mon Mar 25 2002 - 13:36:04 EST

  • Next message: Mark: "RE: [load balancing] Cisco CSS vs. NetScaler?"

    On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 10:32:41PM +0800, Benny Chee wrote:
    > greg,
    >
    > i still have my problem with CSS. Cisco told me that it could handle 4000 flows, i got 2000 flows in, and the performance starts to deteriorate. CPU goes up to 100%. If Netscaler is any good, please drop me a mail as well.
    >
    > i got a load of 150Mb of web traffic loadbalance by 6 caches.

    Not all flows are created equal. depends on what kind of flows they are
    how persistant they are, and what kind of rules you have.

    remember, whatever the vendor tells you is generally the marketing number.

    So in some test case somewhere the vendor sees X performance/throughput/whatever
    then that's the number they will use.

    Remember, YMMV.

    -Alex

    ____________________
    The Load Balancing Mailing List
    Unsubscribe: mailto:majordomoIZZATvegan.net?body=unsubscribe%20lb-l
    Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
    LBDigest: http://lbdigest.com
    MRTG with SLB: http://vegan.net/MRTG
    Hosted by: http://www.tokkisystems.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Mar 25 2002 - 13:44:50 EST