HydraWEB's new product HydraGPS avoids those DSN pitfalls you
mentioned.
It's currently in Beta Trial. For more information go to our
web site: http://www.hydraweb.com/products/hydragps/index.html
Jules
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-lb-lIZZATvegan.net [mailto:owner-lb-lIZZATvegan.net]On Behalf Of KJ
& JC Salchow
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 5:28 PM
To: lb-lIZZATvegan.net
Subject: Re: [load balancing] Verisign and Load Balancers
Speaking of Microsoft (and I'll probably have to turn in my MCSE lapel pin
after this), has anyone else been affected by the seemingly weird
conventions used in IE 5.0 in relation to Load Balancing? Of course after
all of the SSL talk - which from an LB standpoint came from the short TTL on
the SSL ID cache implemented in IE 5.0 - I'm sure we have all been bitten,
but I just found out something new that I'd like some ideas on.
This is about Global Load Balancing - or load balancing between multiple
sites (subnets?). I recently discovered that IE 5.0 (I haven't heard of
this before hand) caches DNS entries for 30 minutes by default. The bad
thing is that even if a site is down, it still hangs on to the address for -
30 minutes. Many, if not all, of the global load balancing methods require
that during the initial connect - a DNS reply with multiple IP addresses is
supplied - that way if the primary is dead, the browser should use the
secondary address. This is basic DNS.
Microsoft's browser no longer does this. It takes one IP address and one
only. Additionally, it will not ask again until the cache on the first one
expires. I have recently seen a test case of this - Netscape worked
perfectly.
In addition, earlier today, while attempting to authenticate to a protected
site - an IE browser prompted for my authentication, but after it was
denied, would not prompt me again until I closed the browser and opened a
new one.
I am sure that all of these items can be corrected by changing settings in
the browser (registry), but if these are the default settings, things are
going to get ugly. Anyone else seen these things or have some global
solution?
Thanks
Ken
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Feb 23 2001 - 22:47:21 EST