Re: [load balancing] Cascading switches off of a Foundry switch

From: Alex Samonte (asamonteIZZATsitesmith.com)
Date: Thu Feb 15 2001 - 18:37:41 EST

  • Next message: Andrew Fort: "RE: [load balancing] Verisign and Load Balancers"

    On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 05:54:36PM -0500, Nimesh Vakharia wrote:
    >
    > Why don't you try impelmenting DSR(direct server return)? You will have to
    > make some modifications on your web/mail servers (add loopbacks) but then
    > you don't have to worry about the traffic flow. You should find some docs
    > on foundry's website.
    > We use it for smtp/www/ftp/https LB. Once setup you don't have to
    > look at it.

    I'm not a big fan of DSR. DSR was a hack so they can double performance
    numbers (it's not a matter of throughput, it's packets per second)

    Making modifications to my web/mail servers is not something I want to do.
    That's why you get a load balancer. And not all servers support binding
    to a bound IP. Some servers you don't have source or support for, and
    then you are SOL.

    Having the LB in the data path is really the only way to make LBs work right
    and if you remove half of that stream, you also lose half of the information.

    When L5 and above information is making more and more of a difference, DSR just
    makes half of it invisible.

    -Alex



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Feb 15 2001 - 18:40:14 EST