Re: RE: [load balancing] Alteon: Servers & Clients located on same IP subnet

Eli,

  No it should not affect it.

Ken
>
> From: <elig@bezeq.com>
> Date: 2007/01/11 Thu PM 12:25:11 CST
> To: <lb-l@vegan.net>
> Subject: RE: [load balancing] Alteon: Servers & Clients located on same IP subnet
>
> Ken, thanks! IP proxy did the job.
> By the way, one of the virtual services is configured for Passive Cookie Persistence. Will it be affected by using IP proxy?
> Thanks. Eli
>
> -----------
> Eli Gal
> Bezeq - the Israeli Telecommunications Company
> Ramat Gan, Israel
> tel: +972-3-5.763.763
> mobile: +972-50-566.54.93
> fax: +1-209-755 5542
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-lb-l@vegan.net [mailto:owner-lb-l@vegan.net] On Behalf Of Ken Thurman
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:21 PM
> To: lb-l@vegan.net; lb-l@vegan.net
> Subject: Re: [load balancing] Alteon: Servers & Clients located on same IP subnet
>
> What is happening is the server is responding directly to the client so the client will reset the connection. You have to enable proxy on the port and create a proxy IP for use on the port. See the application guide on how to do this.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ken Thurman
> >
> > From: <elig@bezeq.com>
> > Date: 2007/01/11 Thu AM 09:33:22 CST
> > To: <lb-l@vegan.net>
> > Subject: [load balancing] Alteon: Servers & Clients located on same IP subnet
> >
> > I have a very weird situation: We have implemented LSB on a 2208 on 2 optical interfaces (ports 9 & 10, external & internal respectively. i.e port 9 is "client enabled" and port 10 is "server enabled"). Everything works fine, unless clients are located on the same IP subnet as the servers. In this instance, the FTP or HTTP requests hang.
> >
> > /info/slb/sess/dump shows the ftp session enrtries as one would expect them:
> >
> > 1,09: 10.200.100.120 21, VIP-of-FTP 10.200.100.121 age 10 P c:1
> > 1,09: 10.200.100.120 24679, VIP-of-FTP ftp -> 2107 10.200.100.121 ftp age 8 v:1 E
> >
> > When I realized that the problem occurs only when clients reside on the port 10 subnet, I added a "client enable" definition on that port thinking that the problem will go away, which unfortunately it didn't.
> > Any ideas what goes wrong and if it can be remedied?
> > Thanks
> > Eli Gal
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________
> > The Load Balancing Mailing List
> > Unsubscribe: mailto:majordomo@vegan.net?body=unsubscribe%20lb-l
> > Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
> > LBDigest: http://lbdigest.com
> > MRTG with SLB: http://vegan.net/MRTG
> > Hosted by: http://www.tokkisystems.com
> >
> >
>
> ____________________
> The Load Balancing Mailing List
> Unsubscribe: mailto:majordomo@vegan.net?body=unsubscribe%20lb-l
> Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
> LBDigest: http://lbdigest.com
> MRTG with SLB: http://vegan.net/MRTG
> Hosted by: http://www.tokkisystems.com
>
>
>
>
> ____________________
> The Load Balancing Mailing List
> Unsubscribe: mailto:majordomo@vegan.net?body=unsubscribe%20lb-l
> Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
> LBDigest: http://lbdigest.com
> MRTG with SLB: http://vegan.net/MRTG
> Hosted by: http://www.tokkisystems.com
>
>

____________________
The Load Balancing Mailing List
Unsubscribe: mailto:majordomo@vegan.net?body=unsubscribe%20lb-l
Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
LBDigest: http://lbdigest.com
MRTG with SLB: http://vegan.net/MRTG
Hosted by: http://www.tokkisystems.com
Received on Thu Jan 11 15:21:29 2007