Re: [load balancing] Question about lbs

From: William Bivens (wjbivensIZZATdigitalme.com)
Date: Fri Jan 16 2004 - 16:52:53 EST

  • Next message: P: "RE: [load balancing] Question about lbs"

    NetScaler does, and I'm sure there are other.

    Sincerely,

    Jay Bivens
    NetScaler, Inc.

    On Jan 15, 2004, at 8:13 AM, Daniel Howe wrote:

    > Hi,
    > as of today Cisco CSS only allow to have a service active/suspend.
    > Problem
    > is how to put that service in "no more connection but keep current
    > users".
    > cisco told us it's coming in new realease. My question is: Is there
    > any lb
    > capable of putting a service into a suspend without lossing the
    > connected
    > users?
    >
    > Thankx.
    >
    > Daniel.
    >
    > ____________________
    > The Load Balancing Mailing List
    > Unsubscribe: mailto:majordomoIZZATvegan.net?body=unsubscribe%20lb-l
    > Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
    > LBDigest: http://lbdigest.com
    > MRTG with SLB: http://vegan.net/MRTG
    > Hosted by: http://www.tokkisystems.com
    >
    >

    ____________________
    The Load Balancing Mailing List
    Unsubscribe: mailto:majordomoIZZATvegan.net?body=unsubscribe%20lb-l
    Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
    LBDigest: http://lbdigest.com
    MRTG with SLB: http://vegan.net/MRTG
    Hosted by: http://www.tokkisystems.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 16 2004 - 17:08:58 EST